Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb 26. pii: S0302-2838(14)00169-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.040. [Epub ahead of print]

Prognostic Significance of Bone Metastases and Bisphosphonate Therapy in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Author information

  • 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
  • 2Pfizer Oncology, New York, NY, USA.
  • 3Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • 4Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: toni_choueiri@DFCI.harvard.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Bone metastases (BMs) are frequently present in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and cause significant morbidity.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this analysis was to assess the impact of BMs and bisphosphonate therapy (BT) on outcomes in mRCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:

We conducted a pooled analysis of patients with mRCC treated from 2003 to 2011 in phase 2 and 3 trials.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS:

We identified 2749 patients treated with sunitinib (n=1059), sorafenib (n=355), axitinib (n=359), temsirolimus (n=208), temsirolimus plus interferon-α (IFN-α) (n=208), or IFN-α (n=560), with 28% (n=781) having BMs. A total of 285 patients (10.4%) received BT. The presence of BMs in patients was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) when compared with patients without BMs (13.2 vs 20.2 mo, respectively; p<0.0001) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs 6.7 mo, respectively; p<0.0008). When stratified by risk groups, the presence of BMs was associated with shorter OS in all risk groups. The use of BT in patients with BMs was not associated with improved OS compared with patients who did not receive BT (13.3 vs 13.1 mo, respectively; p=0.3801) or improved PFS (5.1 vs 4.9 mo, respectively; p=0.1785). Bisphosphonate users with BMs did not have a decreased rate of skeletal-related events (SREs) compared with nonusers (8.6% vs 5.8%, respectively; p=0.191). In addition, BT was associated with increased rates of hypocalcemia, renal insufficiency, and osteonecrosis of the jaw (p<0.0001). Data were analyzed retrospectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

We confirm that the presence of BMs is associated with shorter survival in mRCC. BT did not affect survival or SRE prevention and was associated with increased toxicity.

PATIENT SUMMARY:

In this analysis, we demonstrate that bone metastases are associated with shorter survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In addition, we call into question the utility of bisphosphonate therapy in this population.

Copyright © 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Bisphosphonates; Bone metastases; Renal cell carcinoma; VEGF-targeted therapy; mTOR inhibitors

PMID:
24613250
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
PMCID:
PMC4145043
[Available on 2015/8/26]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk