Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;32(5):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.
  • 2Global Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Shanghai 201203, China.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China. Electronic address: xujianrong_renji@163.com.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the non-Gaussian water diffusion properties of prostate cancer (PCa) and determine the diagnostic performance of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging for distinguishing PCa from benign tissues within the peripheral zone (PZ), and assessing tumor lesions with different Gleason scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Nineteen patients who underwent diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging using multiple b-values and were pathologically confirmed with PCa were enrolled in this study. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived using a monoexponential model, while diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were determined using a DK model. Differences between the ADC, D and K values of benign PZ and PCa, as well as those of tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥8 were assessed. Correlations between parameters D and K in PCa were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. ADC, D and K values were correlated with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥8, respectively.

RESULTS:

ADC and D values were significantly (p<0.001) lower in PCa (0.79±0.14μm(2)/ms and 1.56±0.23μm(2)/ms, respectively) compared to benign PZ (1.23±0.19μm(2)/ms and 2.54±0.24μm(2)/ms, respectively). K values were significantly (p<0.001) greater in PCa (0.96±0.20) compared to benign PZ (0.59±0.08). D and K showed fewer overlapping values between benign PZ and PCa compared to ADC. There was a strong negative correlation between D and K values in PCa (Pearson correlation coefficient r=-0.729; p<0.001). ADC and K values differed significantly in tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥8 (p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively), although no significant difference was detected for D values (p=0.325). Significant correlations were found between the ADC value and Gleason score (r=-0.828; p<0.001), as well as the K value and Gleason score (r=0.729; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

DK model may add value in PCa detection and diagnosis. K potentially offers a new metric for assessment of PCa.

Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Diffusion; Kurtosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Non-Gaussian; Prostate cancer

PMID:
24602826
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk