Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086631. eCollection 2014.

Adverse events profile of PrePex a non-surgical device for adult male circumcision in a Ugandan urban setting.

Author information

  • 1International Hospital Kampala, Kampala, Uganda ; Surgery Department, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
  • 2International Medical Group, Kampala, Uganda.
  • 3Kanombe Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
  • 4International Hospital Kampala, Kampala, Uganda.
  • 5Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • 6International Health Sciences University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • 7Centre of Disease Control, Kampala, Uganda.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Safe Male Circumcision is a proven approach for partial HIV prevention. Several sub Saharan African countries have plans to reach a prevalence of 80% of their adult males circumcised by 2015. These targets require out of ordinary organization, demand creation, timely execution and perhaps the use of SMC devices.

OBJECTIVE:

To profile Adverse Events rate and acceptance of PrePex, a non surgical device for adult male circumcision.

METHODS:

A prospective study, conducted at International Hospital Kampala, Uganda, between August and October 2012. Ethical approval was obtained from Uganda National Council of Science and Technology.

RESULTS:

Of 1,040 men received to undergo SMC, 678 opted for PrePex, 36 were excluded at an initial physical examination screening. 642 were enrolled and consented, and another 17 were excluded before device placement. 625 underwent the procedure. Average age was 24 years (± 7). Twelve moderate AEs occurred among 10 participants 12/625, (1.9%). These were all reversible. Five had device displacement, one had an everted foreskin; five had bleeding after the device was removed and one had voiding difficulties. The majority (279 out of 300) of men interviewed complained of some pain within the week of placement. Mean pain score at device placement (using visual analogue scale) was 0.5, at device removal 4.5 and within 2 min of removal the pain score was 1.4. Over 70% of the devices were placed and removed by non-physician clinicians. Presented with a choice, 60% of men chose PrePex over surgical SMC. Close to 90% would recommend the device to their friends. Odour from the necrotic skin was a concern. Removals done 1-2 days earlier than day 7 were beneficial and conferred no extra risk.

CONCLUSION:

AEs of a moderate or severe nature associated with PrePex were low and reversible. PrePex is feasible for mass safe male circumcision scaling up.

PMID:
24489754
[PubMed - in process]
PMCID:
PMC3904949
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk