Metabolic flexibility as a major predictor of spatial distribution in microbial communities

PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e85105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085105. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

A better understand the ecology of microbes and their role in the global ecosystem could be achieved if traditional ecological theories can be applied to microbes. In ecology organisms are defined as specialists or generalists according to the breadth of their niche. Spatial distribution is often used as a proxy measure of niche breadth; generalists have broad niches and a wide spatial distribution and specialists a narrow niche and spatial distribution. Previous studies suggest that microbial distribution patterns are contrary to this idea; a microbial generalist genus (Desulfobulbus) has a limited spatial distribution while a specialist genus (Methanosaeta) has a cosmopolitan distribution. Therefore, we hypothesise that this counter-intuitive distribution within generalist and specialist microbial genera is a common microbial characteristic. Using molecular fingerprinting the distribution of four microbial genera, two generalists, Desulfobulbus and the methanogenic archaea Methanosarcina, and two specialists, Methanosaeta and the sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfobacter were analysed in sediment samples from along a UK estuary. Detected genotypes of both generalist genera showed a distinct spatial distribution, significantly correlated with geographic distance between sites. Genotypes of both specialist genera showed no significant differential spatial distribution. These data support the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of specialist and generalist microbes does not match that seen with specialist and generalist large organisms. It may be that generalist microbes, while having a wider potential niche, are constrained, possibly by intrageneric competition, to exploit only a small part of that potential niche while specialists, with far fewer constraints to their niche, are more capable of filling their potential niche more effectively, perhaps by avoiding intrageneric competition. We suggest that these counter-intuitive distribution patterns may be a common feature of microbes in general and represent a distinct microbial principle in ecology, which is a real challenge if we are to develop a truly inclusive ecology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Archaea / classification
  • Archaea / metabolism*
  • Bacteria, Anaerobic / classification
  • Bacteria, Anaerobic / metabolism*
  • DNA Fingerprinting
  • Deltaproteobacteria / classification
  • Deltaproteobacteria / metabolism*
  • Ecosystem
  • Estuaries
  • Genotype
  • Methanosarcina / classification
  • Methanosarcina / metabolism*
  • Microbial Consortia / physiology
  • Spatial Analysis
  • Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria / classification
  • Sulfur-Reducing Bacteria / metabolism*

Grants and funding

This study was performed as part of an EU Commission funded Marie Curie Excellence Grant for Teams, MicroComXT (MEXT-CT-2005-024112) to KJP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.