Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jan;138(1):76-87. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0472-OA.

Variability of pathologists' utilization of p16 and ki-67 immunostaining in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies in routine pathology practice and its impact on the frequencies of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnoses and cytohistologic correlations.

Author information

  • 1From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School (Drs Singh, Truskinovsky, Thyagarajan, Gulbahce, Manivel, and Pambuccian); the School of Nursing, University of Minnesota (Ms Savik); and the Cytology Laboratory, University of Minnesota Medical Center-Fairview (Mr Amirouche and Ms Holler), Minneapolis. Dr Pambuccian is now at the Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

The use of p16 in cervical biopsies improves the accuracy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) diagnosis and grading and decreases its interpathologist variability.

OBJECTIVE:

To determine the impact of the frequency of use of p16 immunostains in cervical biopsies on pathologists' diagnoses of CIN grade 1 and grade 2 or above (CIN1 and CIN2+) and on cytohistologic correlations.

DESIGN:

We identified all cervical biopsy specimens with cytologic correlations subjected or not to p16 staining from January 1, 2005, to September 30, 2010; calculated each pathologist's percentage of p16 use; and correlated it with their major cytohistologic discrepancy rates, CIN2+ diagnoses, and CIN1/CIN2+ ratios.

RESULTS:

During the study period, each of the 23 pathologists interpreted 59 to 1811 (mean, 518) of 11‚ÄČ850 cervical biopsy specimens, used p16 for 0% to 21.31% (mean, 10.14%) of these, had CIN2+ detection rates of 9.5% to 24.1% (mean, 18.9%), and CIN1/CIN2+ ratios of 0.7 to 4.5 (mean, 1.5). Compared to the 12 "low users" of p16, who used p16 fewer times than the institution's mean for p16 use, the 11 "high users" of p16 diagnosed more biopsies (8391 versus 3459), had a lower rate of major cytohistologic discrepancies (12.62% versus 14.92%, P < .001), a higher rate of CIN2+ diagnoses (19.9% versus 16.4%, P < .001), a lower range of CIN2+ rates (15.0%-23.1% versus 9.5%-24.1%), and lower CIN1/CIN2+ ratios (1.2 versus 2.3).

CONCLUSIONS:

We found a high intrainstitutional variability of p16 use in cervical biopsies, CIN2+ rates, and CIN1/CIN2+ ratios. Use of p16 for greater than 10% of cervical biopsies was associated with improved cytohistologic correlation rates and with lower variability in the frequencies of histologic diagnoses.

PMID:
24377814
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Allen Press, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk