Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014 Feb;29(2):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

A biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament suspensory fixation devices in a porcine cadaver model.

Author information

  • 1University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • 2University of Colorado-Denver, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: Todd.Baldini@UCDenver.edu.
  • 3Stryker Joint Preservation, Mahwah, NJ, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Suspensory fixation use during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has increased due to ease of use and high pullout strength. We hypothesize that there are no significant differences in biomechanical performance among four types of suspensory fixation devices: Stryker VersiTomic G-Lok, Smith & Nephew Endobutton, Biomet ToggleLoc, and Arthrex RetroButton.

METHODS:

Forty fresh frozen porcine femurs and flexor digitorum profundus tendons were obtained. Each tendon graft was sized to 8.5mm or 9.0mm. Ten of each device were used to fix the grafts in the femur at the 2 o'clock (left) or 10 o'clock (right) position. The graft-femur complex was secured to a servohydraulic test machine in line with the femoral tunnel. The graft was cyclically loaded from 50 to 250 N for 1000 cycles at 1 Hz then loaded to failure at 20mm/min. Actuator load and displacement were recorded. Data were analyzed with multiple one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests. Bonferroni correction was applied resulting in P ≤ 0.005 considered statistically significant for ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05 for Tukey.

FINDINGS:

There were no significant differences in cyclic displacement among any of the groups (P=0.43). The only significant difference in failure properties is the Endobutton exhibited at least 50% greater displacement at failure than the other three devices.

INTERPRETATION:

Suspensory femoral soft tissue fixation devices are biomechanically similar with respect to failure load but differ in failure displacement. However, there was no significant difference in displacement after cyclic loading. All four fixation devices should withstand the forces associated with daily activities without failure.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery; Knee arthroscopy

PMID:
24321231
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk