Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Feb;83(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.011. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

Implementing smart pump technology in a pediatric intensive care unit: a cost-effective approach.

Author information

  • 1Pharmacy Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: smanrique.hgugm@salud.madrid.org.
  • 2Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/ Maiquez, 9, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
  • 3Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Avda Fuerzas Armadas s/n, 18014 Granada, Spain.
  • 4Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus de Cartuja, Granada, Spain.
  • 5Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
  • 6Pharmacy Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the cost effectiveness of implementing smart infusion pump technology in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

An observational, prospective, intervention study with analytical components was carried out. A drug library was developed and integrated into the Carefusion Alaris Guardrails® infusion systems. A systematic analysis of all the data stored on the devices during use was performed by the data processing program Guardrails® CQI v4.1 Event Reporter. Intercepted errors were classified in terms of their potential severity and probability of causing an adverse effect (PAE) had they reached the patient. Knowing the estimated cost of a preventable adverse effect (AE), we analyzed costs saved and the profit/cost ratio resulting from the implementation process.

RESULTS:

Compliance with the drug library was 92% and during the study period 92 infusion-related programming errors were intercepted, leading to a saving of 172,279 euros by preventing AEs. This means that 2.15 euros would be obtained for each euro invested in hiring a pharmacist to implement this technology.

DISCUSSION:

The high percentage of use of safety software in our study compared to others allowed for the interception of 92 errors. The estimation of the potential impact of these errors is based on clinical judgment. The cost saved might be underestimated because the cost of an AE is usually higher in pediatrics, indirect and intangible costs were not considered and pharmacists involved do not spend the whole day on this task.

CONCLUSIONS:

Smart pumps have shown to be profitable in a PICU because they have the ability to intercept potentially serious medication errors and reduce costs associated with such errors.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Cost-effectiveness; Pediatric intensive care; Programming errors; Safety; Smart pumps

PMID:
24296271
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk