Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Aust Crit Care. 2014 Aug;27(3):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

Nurses' perceptions of accessing a Medical Emergency Team: a qualitative study.

Author information

  • 1Clinical Sciences 2 (G16) 2.49, School of Nursing and Midwifery - Gold Coast, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia. Electronic address: d.massey@griffith.edu.au.
  • 2Clinical Sciences 2 (G16) 2.62, Centre of Research Excellence in Nursing (NCREN), School of Nursing and Midwifery - Gold Coast, Gold Coast Campus, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia. Electronic address: w.chaboyer@griffith.edu.au.
  • 3Health Sciences (N48) 2.09, School of Nursing and Midwifery - Nathan, Nathan Campus, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, QLD 4111, Australia. Electronic address: l.aitken@griffith.edu.au.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Medical Emergency Teams (METs) have been developed and implemented with the aim of improving recognition of and response to deteriorating patients. Yet, METs are often not activated or used effectively by nursing staff. The reasons for this are not fully understood.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to explore nurses' experiences and perceptions of using and activating a MET, in order to understand the facilitators and barriers to nurse's use of the MET.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:

An interpretive qualitative approach was adopted to explore nurses' experiences and perceptions of using and activating the MET. This study was set in a large public teaching hospital in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Fifteen registered ward nurses who had cared for patients who had deteriorated on the ward, and as a result of this deterioration were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as an unplanned admission, were interviewed about their experiences and perceptions of using a MET.

METHODS:

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ward nurses who had cared for a patient who had deteriorated. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interviews were analysed thematically.

FINDINGS:

Four themes relating to the participants' experiences and perceptions of using a MET emerged from the data. These themes were: (1) sensing clinical deterioration; (2) resisting and hesitating; (3) pushing the button; and (4) support and leadership.

CONCLUSION:

This work identifies why nurses do not activate METs appropriately. This delay in MET activation potentially exposes the deteriorating patient to suboptimal care and increases the risk of adverse events.

Crown Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Clinical deterioration; Medical Emergency Teams; Patient deterioration; Patient safety

PMID:
24290323
[PubMed - in process]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk