Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;63(4):392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Uncontrolled organ donation after circulatory determination of death: US policy failures and call to action.

Author information

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Bellevue Hospital Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • 3Department of Bioethics, NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation, New York, NY.
  • 4Department of Emergency Medicine, Bellevue Hospital Center, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. Electronic address: Lewis.Goldfrank@nyumc.org.

Abstract

In the United States, more than 115,000 patients are wait-listed for organ transplants despite that there are 12,000 patients each year who die or become too ill for transplantation. One reason for the organ shortage is that candidates for donation must die in the hospital, not the emergency department (ED), either from neurologic or circulatory-respiratory death under controlled circumstances. Evidence from Spain and France suggests that a substantial number of deaths from cardiac arrest may qualify for organ donation using uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death (uDCDD) protocols that rapidly initiate organ preservation in out-of-hospital and ED settings. Despite its potential, uDCDD has been criticized by panels of experts that included neurologists, intensivists, attorneys, and ethicists who suggest that organ preservation strategies that reestablish oxygenated circulation to the brain retroactively negate previous death determination based on circulatory-respiratory criteria and hence violate the dead donor rule. In this article, we assert that in uDCDD, all efforts at saving lives are exhausted before organ donation is considered, and death is determined according to "irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions" evidenced by "persistent cessation of functions during an appropriate period of observation and/or trial of therapy." Therefore, postmortem in vivo organ preservation with chest compressions, mechanical ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is legally and ethically appropriate. As frontline providers for patients presenting with unexpected cardiac arrest, emergency medicine practitioners need be included in the uDCDD debate to advocate for patients and honor the wishes of the deceased.

Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
24268427
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk