Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 4;63(8):763-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Prospective multicenter evaluation of the direct flow medical transcatheter aortic valve.

Author information

  • 1Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer, Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: schofer@herz-hh.de.
  • 2San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
  • 3Azienda Ospedaliera Niguarda Ca Granda, Milan, Italy.
  • 4Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • 5Medical Care Center Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer, Hamburg University Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg, Germany.
  • 6MedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
  • 7University of California Davis, Davis, California; St. Thomas' Hospital, London, England.
  • 8The Heart Hospital, London, England.
  • 9University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • 10Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen, Trier, Germany.
  • 11Asklepios Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • 12Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
  • 13L'Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, L'Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, Massy, France.
  • 14Clinical Imaging Analytics, Guerneville, California.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The study sought a prospective multicenter nonrandomized evaluation of the Direct Flow Medical (DFM) system for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND:

The DFM transcatheter aortic valve system is a nonmetallic design with a pressurized support structure that allows precise positioning, retrieval, and assessment of valve performance prior to permanent implantation.

METHODS:

One hundred high surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis were evaluated for the primary endpoint. There were 75 patients in the group evaluable for the secondary endpoints and 25 in the pre-specified roll-in training phase. Echocardiographic and angiographic data were evaluated by an independent core laboratory and adverse events adjudicated by clinical event committee and classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC) criteria.

RESULTS:

There was 99% freedom from all cause mortality at 30 days (primary endpoint). VARC criteria defined 30 day combined freedom from patient safety event rate was 91% and overall device success was 93%. The post-implantation echocardiography results demonstrated mild or no aortic regurgitation in 99% (73 of 74) with a mean gradient of 12.6 ± 7.1 mm Hg (n = 72) and effective orifice area of 1.50 ± 0.56 cm(2) and New York Heart Association functional class was I or II in 92% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of the DFM system in surgical high risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex anatomy aortic regurgitation was less than moderate in 99% of patients.

Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

TAVR; aortic regurgitation; aortic valve stenosis; transfemoral

PMID:
24211506
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk