Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Oct;37(5):307-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.006.

Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St., OBC-3-010, Boston, MA 02115. Electronic address: pdoubilet@partners.org.

Abstract

Accurate pregnancy dating is important for diagnostic and management decisions during pregnancy. Dating by last menstrual period is less reliable than dating by ultrasound, since the former has memory-related and other sources of inaccuracy. Dating by first trimester ultrasound, via the crown-rump length, has a 95% confidence range of ±5 days, slightly better than the ±8 days for dating by second trimester ultrasound at 14-20 weeks. This small difference appears to be too small to justify a routine first trimester scan for the purpose of dating the pregnancy.

© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

First trimester; Gestational age; Last menstrual period; Second trimester; Ultrasound

PMID:
24176152
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk