Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2013 Dec;206(6):929-33; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

The (f)utility of flexion-extension C-spine films in the setting of trauma.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Flexion-extension radiographs are often used to assess for removal of the cervical collar in the setting of trauma. The objective of this study was to evaluate their adequacy. We hypothesized that a significant proportion is inadequate.

METHODS:

This was a retrospective review of C-spine clearance at a level 1 trauma center. A trauma-trained radiologist interpreted all flexion-extension radiographs for adequacy. Studies performed within 7 days of injury were considered acute.

RESULTS:

Three hundred fifty-five flexion-extension radiographs were examined. Ninety-five percent% of these studies were inadequate (51% because of the inability to visualize the top of T1, whereas 44% had less than 30° of angulation from neutral). Two hundred ten studies were performed acutely; of these, 97% were inadequate. When performed 7 days or longer from injury, 91% were inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS:

Injury to the C-spine may harbor significant consequences; therefore, its proper evaluation is critical. The majority of flexion-extension films are inadequate. As such, they should not be included in the algorithm for removal of the cervical collar. If used, adequacy must be verified and supplemental radiographic studies obtained as indicated.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Adequacy; Cervical spine injury; Flexion/extension radiography; Trauma

PMID:
24139671
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk