Factors affecting use of veterinarians by small-scale food animal operations

J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Nov 1;243(9):1334-44. doi: 10.2460/javma.243.9.1334.

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with use of a veterinarian by small-scale food animal operations.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive survey.

Sample: 16,000 small-scale farm or ranch operations in all 50 states.

Procedures: Surveys were conducted via mail or telephone during 2011 for small-scale operations (gross annual agricultural sales between $10,000 and $499,999) in which an animal or animal product comprised the highest percentage of annual sales.

Results: 8,186 (51.2%) operations responded to the survey; 7,849 surveys met the inclusion criteria. For 6,511 (83.0%) operations, beef cattle were the primary animal species. An estimated 82.1% of operations (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.1% to 83.0%) had a veterinarian available ≤ 29 miles away; 1.4% (95% CI, 1.2% to 1.7%) did not have a veterinarian available within 100 miles of the operation. Operations for which the nearest veterinarian was ≥ 100 miles away or for which a veterinarian was not available were located in 40 US states. Overall, 61.7% of operations (95% CI, 60.6% to 62.9%) had used a veterinarian during the 12 months prior to the survey. Producers with college degrees were significantly more likely to use a veterinarian (675%) versus those who did not complete high school (52.9%).

Conclusions and clinical relevance: Results of this study indicated most small-scale operations had adequate access to veterinarians during 2011, but there seemed to be localized shortages of veterinarians in many states.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animal Husbandry / economics
  • Animal Husbandry / methods*
  • Animal Welfare
  • Animals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Data Collection
  • Education
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • United States
  • Veterinarians*
  • Young Adult