Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Radiology. 2014 Jan;270(1):82-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122345. Epub 2013 Oct 28.

Cardiac MR imaging to measure myocardial blood flow response to the cold pressor test in healthy smokers and nonsmokers.

Author information

  • 1From the Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre & Leeds Institute of Genetics, Health and Therapeutics (T.A.F., M.M., A.N.M., A.M.L., J.P.G., S.P.), Division of Medical Physics (J.D.B.), and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit and School of Medicine (A.R.), University of Leeds, Leeds, England.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To determine if myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can show changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during the cold pressor test (CPT) and can allow identification of the differing endothelial function of smokers and nonsmokers when compared during adenosine stress.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The study was approved by the institutional ethics review board and all participants gave informed written consent. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers (19 nonsmokers, 10 smokers; mean age ± standard deviation, 22 years ± 4) underwent 1.5-T MR imaging and analysis. Myocardial perfusion was assessed during rest, peak CPT, and adenosine hyperemia with a saturation-recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence (spatial resolution, 2.4 × 2.4 × 10 mm). Global, endocardial, and epicardial MBF were calculated by using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. Paired and independent t test statistical analyses were used to compare the responses between tests and groups. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of MBF change.

RESULTS:

MBF at rest was similar between the nonsmoking and smoking groups (0.97 mL/g/min ± 0.4 vs 0.96 mL/g/min ± 0.3, respectively; P = .96). Nonsmokers responded to CPT with a 47% increase in MBF (1.43 mL/g/min ± 0.5) and smokers responded with a 27% increase (1.22 mL/g/min ± 0.4; P < .001). An endocardial-to-epicardial gradient existed at rest (nonsmokers, 1.10 [P = .002]; smokers, 1.30 [P = .01]) and CPT (nonsmokers, 1.19 [P < .001] smokers, 1.28 [P = .04]) but reversed during adenosine stress (nonsmokers, 0.89 [P = .03]; smokers, 0.92 [P = .42]).

CONCLUSION:

Myocardial perfusion cardiac MR imaging during CPT can allow assessment of changes in MBF globally and in the separate myocardial layers in healthy smokers and nonsmokers. This allows the combined assessment of endothelium-dependent (CPT) and endothelium-independent (adenosine stress test) MBF reserve in a single study.

© RSNA, 2013.

PMID:
24072774
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk