Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Nov;22(11):2047-54. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0409. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

Telomere length varies by DNA extraction method: implications for epidemiologic research.

Author information

  • 1Authors' Affiliations: Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Health Sciences Research, and Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine; Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Population Health Sciences, and Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire; Public Health Sciences Division, Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; The Stanford Cancer Institute and Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, California; Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Clive Berghofer Cancer Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland; and Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Both shorter and longer telomeres in peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) DNA have been associated with cancer risk. However, associations remain inconsistent across studies of the same cancer type. This study compares DNA preparation methods to determine telomere length from patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS:

We examined PBL relative telomere length (RTL) measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in 1,033 patients with colorectal cancer and 2,952 healthy controls. DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform, PureGene, or QIAamp.

RESULTS:

We observed differences in RTL depending on DNA extraction method (P < 0.001). Phenol/chloroform-extracted DNA had a mean RTL (T/S ratio) of 0.78 (range 0.01-6.54) compared with PureGene-extracted DNA (mean RTL of 0.75; range 0.00-12.33). DNA extracted by QIAamp yielded a mean RTL of 0.38 (range 0.02-3.69). We subsequently compared RTL measured by qPCR from an independent set of 20 colorectal cancer cases and 24 normal controls in PBL DNA extracted by each of the three extraction methods. The range of RTL measured by qPCR from QIAamp-extracted DNA (0.17-0.58) was less than from either PureGene or phenol/chloroform (ranges, 0.04-2.67 and 0.32-2.81, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

RTL measured by qPCR from QIAamp-extracted DNA was less than from either PureGene or phenol/chloroform (P < 0.001).

IMPACT:

Differences in DNA extraction method may contribute to the discrepancies between studies seeking to find an association between the risk of cancer or other diseases and RTL.

©2013 AACR.

PMID:
24019396
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3827976
Free PMC Article

Publication Types, MeSH Terms, Substances, Grant Support

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk