Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(4):585-98.

Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation: individual versus group trial results.

Author information

  • 1Health Services Research & Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, 1100 Olive Way, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. margaret.collins@va.gov

Abstract

We designed this noninferiority randomized trial to determine (1) if group hearing aid fitting visits and group hearing aid follow-up visits were at least as effective as individual visits in terms of hearing-related function (measured with the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation [EAR] scale) and adherence, and (2) if group visits were less costly over the 6 mo post-fitting period. For 644 participants randomized to receive their hearing aid visits in an individual or group format at the Department of Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 6 mo outcomes showed no significant differences in Inner EAR scores between individual and group fitting (p = 0.53) or follow-up (p = 0.11), or in the number of hours per day hearing aids were worn between individual and group fitting (p = 0.90) or follow-up (p = 0.24). We found significantly higher cost for individual compared with group fitting (p < 0.001) and follow-up (p < 0.001). We conclude that outcomes for group hearing aid fitting and hearing aid follow-up visits were not inferior to individual hearing aid fitting and follow-up visits, with group fitting and follow-up visits yielding cost savings.

PMID:
23934877
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Department of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk