Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
N Z Med J. 2013 Apr 5;126(1372):25-31.

Who should manage transient ischemic attacks? A comparison between stroke experts, generalists, and electronic decision support.

Author information

  • 1Department of Neurology, MidCentral Health, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. anna.ranta@otago.ac.nz

Abstract

AIMS:

Rapid expert management of transient ischemic attacks (TIA) has been shown to reduce the incidence of stroke, but is not always achievable. This study aims to demonstrate that TIA management by stroke experts is indeed more guideline adherent than that of generalists and that a TIA/stroke electronic decision support (EDS) tool closely mimics expert advice and improves guideline adherence.

METHODS:

11 general practitioners (GPs), 12 general physicians, and 12 stroke specialists assessed and provided management plans for 7 hypothetical patients with potential TIAs. Responses were compared with the advice provided when patient data was entered into a TIA/stroke EDS programme.

RESULTS:

Diagnosis and medical management was highly consistent and guideline adherent amongst stroke experts. Diagnostic accuracy was lower in the GP and general physician groups (76% and 79% respectively) and only one-third of generalists initiated best medical therapy when indicated. The TIA/stroke EDS consistently agreed with expert diagnosis, investigations, and medical management and provided most comprehensive lifestyle advice.

COCNLUSION:

This study (a) confirms that stroke expert care achieves higher guideline adherence and (b) provides validation that the TIA/stroke EDS tool is able to mimic expert advice and can reliably apply best practice guidelines.

PMID:
23793174
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk