Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Aug;28(8):454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

Biodiversity data should be published, cited, and peer reviewed.

Author information

  • 1Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.


Concerns over data quality impede the use of public biodiversity databases and subsequent benefits to society. Data publication could follow the well-established publication process: with automated quality checks, peer review, and editorial decisions. This would improve data accuracy, reduce the need for users to 'clean' the data, and might increase data use. Authors and editors would get due credit for a peer-reviewed (data) publication through use and citation metrics. Adopting standards related to data citation, accessibility, metadata, and quality control would facilitate integration of data across data sets. Here, we propose a staged publication process involving editorial and technical quality controls, of which the final (and optional) stage includes peer review, the most meritorious publication standard in science.

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Global Biodiversity Information Facility; databases; journals; quality control; species

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk