Display Settings:


Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Chest. 2013 Jun;143(6):1542-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2491.

Quality improvement and pay for performance: barriers to and strategies for success.

Author information

  • 1Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-Long Island Jewish School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA. rocohen@nshs.edu


Linking health-care quality improvement to payment appears straightforward. Improve the care that one provides to one's patients, and one is rewarded financially. Should one fail to improve care, then one is financially penalized. However, this strategy assumes that health-care workers and administrators possess the necessary tools and knowledge to improve care and that the metrics being measured have been rigorously tested. Although health-care workers and hospitals are publically committed to reducing inappropriate care, improving patient safety, achieving better health outcomes, and holding down costs, many are unsure how to do this effectively. We present the case that it is not usually the people who create the problems in our health system; rather, it is the processes of the care-delivery system that require change. Incentivizing performance improvement using simple metrics is unlikely to work before using compensation strategies to incentivize behavior change in clinical systems. But prior to even doing this, leaders and physicians must first create accurate performance measures and understand improvement science.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk