Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Biochem. 2013 Aug;46(12):969-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

Analytical and assay issues for use of cardiac troponin testing for risk stratification in primary care.

Author information

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. wualan@labmed2.ucsf.edu

Abstract

Cardiac troponin is the standard marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and risk stratification of patients who present to an emergency department with signs and symptoms of acute cardiac ischemia. Over the past few years, the analytical sensitivity of assays for cardiac troponin has improved significantly to the point where a detectable amount of troponin can be measured in essentially all healthy subjects. Recent studies have shown that use of a highly sensitive troponin assays may provide value to traditional markers of primary disease risk for patients, i.e., for those who have no history of heart disease. There are barriers to the adoption of cardiac troponin for screening high risk cohorts such as the elderly, diabetics and perhaps even the asymptomatic population. Strategies used for the assignment of cutoff concentrations in acute care, i.e., the 99 th percentile, may not be appropriate for primary care as changes over baseline levels may provide more accurate information of risk than cross-sectional results. A review of biological variation has shown that cardiac troponin as a biomarker has low index of individuality, indicating that reference values are of little utility. Whether or not cardiac troponin can be released in reversible injury is a debate that could have significance for detecting minor myocardial injury. A major hurdle for use of troponin in primary care is the lack of assay standardization and nomenclature for the different generations of troponin assays. Standardization requires knowledge of what is released after cardiac injury and what the various cardiac troponin assays are measuring. Currently it is not clear if the cardiac troponin release after ischemic injury is identical to that in circulation of healthy individuals. This may affect the design of future assays and standardization approaches. There is potential that a marker of myocardial injury such as troponin can add to the value of existing indicators and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk. Additional analytical and clinical validations are needed to fully elucidate cardiac troponin metabolism and resolve ongoing clinical and laboratory issues. While these issues are directed to the use of troponin in primary care, most of these concepts are relevant to the use of troponin in acute coronary syndromes as well.

Copyright © 2013 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

ACC; AHA; AMI; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; Biological variation; CK; CV(A), CV(I), CV(G); Cardiac troponin; ESC; European Society of Cardiology; IFCC; II; ISO; International Federation of Clinical Chemistry; International Organization for Standardization; International System of Units; NACB; National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry; Primary cardiovascular disease risk; RCV; RM; ROC; Reversible injury; SI; SMCD; SRM; Standardization; Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage; WHO; World Health Organization; acute myocardial infarction; cTnI and cTnT; cardiac troponin I and T; coefficient of variance analytical, intraindividual, and interindividual; creatine kinase; index of individuality; receiver operating characteristic; reference change value; reference material; standard reference material

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk