Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jul;52(1):52-8.

Body composition of humans: comparison of two improved four-compartment models that differ in expense, technical complexity, and radiation exposure.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, NY.

Abstract

Multicompartment models are of growing importance in the study of body composition in humans. This study compares two improved four-compartment (water, protein, mineral, and fat) models that differ in expense, technological complexity, and radiation exposure. Primary data (from 31 subjects) for the first model were derived by dual-photon absorptiometry, 3H2O dilution, and hydrodensitometry and for the second model by delayed and prompt gamma neutron-activation analysis and 3H2O dilution. Estimates of fat, protein, and mineral from the first model were highly correlated with those from the second model (r = 0.98, 0.72, and 0.94, respectively; all p less than 0.001). The proportions of body weight represented by water, protein, mineral, and fat for the simpler first model (0.532, 0.155, 0.048, and 0.265) were similar to compartment fractions provided by the more complex and costly second model (0.532, 0.143, 0.046, and 0.279). Multicompartment body composition models can thus be developed from increasingly available techniques that compare favorably with similar results derived from limited-access instrumentation.

PMID:
2360552
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk