Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Med Law Rev. 2013 Summer;21(3):487-98. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwt004. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Escaping the shackles of law at the end of life: R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin).

Author information

  • Exeter College, University of Oxford, UK. jon.herring@law.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

This commentary discusses the decision in R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice;(1) it will argue that the court should have allowed the use of the defence of necessity. It argues that the official response of the law should be to outlaw euthanasia or assisted suicide, but also to recognise that in exceptional circumstances these should be permitted. The use of the defence of necessity permits this nuanced response to the issue. The commentary also argues that the treatment of suicidal and elderly people is a far more important issue than creating the correct legal response to assisted dying.

KEYWORDS:

assisted dying; death; euthanasia; human rights; necessity; rule of law

PMID:
23598284
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk