Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):100-5. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12308.

The n- vs. u-serration is a learnable criterion to differentiate pemphigoid from epidermolysis bullosa acquisita in direct immunofluorescence serration pattern analysis.

Author information

  • 1Center for Skin Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands. j.b.terra@umcg.nl

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Serration pattern analysis of direct immunofluorescence (DIF) allows the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subtypes of pemphigoid. In daily practice its use is limited due to lack of experience and unfamiliarity.

OBJECTIVES:

To test the learnability of DIF serrated-pattern recognition in groups with various a priori levels of competence.

METHODS:

An online nversusu-test (www.nversusu.umcg.nl) was created, which contained 26 DIF images of the epidermal basement membrane zone, IgG stained and photographed with a magnification of × 40 and × 63. All images represented patients with a form of subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease. Thirteen DIF images were presented before and 13 DIF images after an instruction video about n- and u-serrated patterns. There were three options to choose from: n-serrated, u-serrated or undetermined. The test was completed by three groups of professionals: dermatology residents in training at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), international experts on bullous diseases, and dermatologists and pathologists who had participated in the Groningen blistering course during the past 10 years.

RESULTS:

The overall number of correct answers of serration patterns was significantly higher after instruction than before instruction (median 9.0 correct answers vs. 11.0 correct answers, P < 0.001). Participants showed a mean improvement after instruction of 15.4% in the UMCG group (66.7% vs. 82.1%), 16.2% in the international expert group (67.2% vs. 83.4%) and 12.1% in the blistering course group (60.7% vs. 72.8%). The u-serrated pattern was better recognized than the n-serrated pattern.

CONCLUSIONS:

Serration pattern analysis by DIF can be learned irrespective of background of expertise.

© 2013 The Authors BJD © 2013 British Association of Dermatologists.

PMID:
23489262
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk