Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Neurology. 2013 Mar 19;80(12):1156-60. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828868d0. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

Practice patterns for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Author information

  • 1FrDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. MRN@UCLA.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The professional practice of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) has evolved over the past 30 years. This report describes the field's current state and how site of service affects practice.

METHODS:

A survey queried American Academy of Neurology IOM neurologist members about their IOM volume, case type, duration, numbers of simultaneous cases, and location of the monitoring physician.

RESULTS:

Physicians located locally typically monitored fewer cases annually and simultaneously compared to physicians who monitored from remote locations. Physicians at remote locations monitored proportionally more spine procedures, whereas physicians who monitored locally monitored more intracranial procedures and a greater variety of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

The remote monitoring practice model is different from local models in annual volume, simultaneous cases, work per case, and types of cases.

Comment in

PMID:
23427317
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk