Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013 Feb 20;4(2):248-54. doi: 10.1021/cn300177g. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

The relative orientation of the TM3 and TM4 domains varies between α1 and α3 glycine receptors.

Author information

  • 1Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.

Abstract

Glycine receptors (GlyRs) are anion-conducting members of the pentameric ligand-gated ion channel family. We previously showed that the dramatic difference in glycine efficacies of α1 and α3 GlyRs is largely attributable to their nonconserved TM4 domains. Because mutation of individual nonconserved TM4 residues had little effect, we concluded that the efficacy difference was a distributed effect of all nonconserved TM4 residues. We therefore hypothesized that the TM4 domains of α1 and α3 GlyRs differ in structure, membrane orientation, and/or molecular dynamic properties. Here we employed voltage-clamp fluorometry to test whether their TM4 domains interact differently with their respective TM3 domains. We found a rhodamine fluorophore covalently attached to a homologous TM4 residue in each receptor interacts differentially with a conserved TM3 residue. We conclude that the α1 and α3 GlyR TM4 domains are orientated differently relative to their TM3 domains. This may underlie their differential ability to influence glycine efficacy.

PMID:
23421675
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3582286
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Chemical Society Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk