Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 May;121(2):170-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.016. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.

Author information

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.



To evaluate anatomic and sexual outcomes among patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse, defined as stage III or higher by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q), who underwent modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.


Between March 2007 and December 2010, a prospective study in Beijing, China, enrolled 21 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy, followed by modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with the attachment of mesh straps transvaginally and the sacral attachment of mesh laparoscopically. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and yearly. Anatomic success was defined as POP-Q lower than stage II. Sexual outcomes were assessed via the short-form Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12).


During a median follow-up of 43.5 months (range 18-60 months), the surgical success rate was 100%, the patient satisfaction rate was 90.4%, and 1 patient (4.8%) experienced mesh exposure. Postoperatively, 20 patients were sexually active (95.2%). There was a significant improvement between pre- and postoperative PISQ-12 scores both for the total score (31.6 vs 38.5; P<0.001), and for 5 individual items (P<0.01).


Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh seemed to be safe and might simplify the surgical approach to severe POP with satisfying anatomic and functional outcomes. It did not affect sexual function negatively.

Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk