Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40(4):372-86. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12028. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

Bayesian network meta-analysis of root coverage procedures: ranking efficacy and identification of best treatment.

Author information

  • 1Department of Public Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. ruijack@libero.it

Abstract

AIMS:

The aim of this work was to conduct a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NM) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish a ranking in efficacy and the best technique for coronally advanced flap (CAF)-based root coverage procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

A literature search on PubMed, Cochrane libraries, EMBASE, and hand-searched journals until June 2012 was conducted to identify RCTs on treatments of Miller Class I and II gingival recessions with at least 6 months of follow-up. The treatment outcomes were recession reduction (RecRed), clinical attachment gain (CALgain), keratinized tissue gain (KTgain), and complete root coverage (CRC).

RESULTS:

Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria, 20 of which were classified as at high risk of bias. The CAF+connective tissue graft (CTG) combination ranked highest in effectiveness for RecRed (Probability of being the best = 40%) and CALgain (Pr = 33%); CAF+enamel matrix derivative (EMD) was slightly better for CRC; CAF+Collagen Matrix (CM) appeared effective for KTgain (Pr = 69%). Network inconsistency was low for all outcomes excluding CALgain.

CONCLUSION:

CAF+CTG might be considered the gold standard in root coverage procedures. The low amount of inconsistency gives support to the reliability of the present findings.

© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

PMID:
23346965
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk