Abstract
The contemporary system of prospective oversight of human subjects research has been criticized as inefficient and ineffective. Plausible approaches to research oversight range from no prospective review, to review-and-comment, to the current review-and-approve regime. Articulating this spectrum offers an opportunity to consider systematically the strengths and disadvantages of each.
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
MeSH terms
-
Confidentiality / legislation & jurisprudence
-
Cost-Benefit Analysis
-
Efficiency, Organizational
-
Ethics Committees, Research / economics
-
Ethics Committees, Research / organization & administration*
-
Guideline Adherence / economics
-
Guideline Adherence / organization & administration
-
Human Experimentation / ethics*
-
Humans
-
Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence
-
Models, Organizational
-
United States