Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 16;3:496. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00496. eCollection 2012.

Emotion regulation and emotion work: two sides of the same coin?

Author information

  • 1Department of Sociology and Cluster of Excellence "Languages of Emotion," Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

This contribution links psychological models of emotion regulation to sociological accounts of emotion work to demonstrate the extent to which emotion regulation is systematically shaped by culture and society. I first discuss a well-established two-factor process model of emotion regulation and argue that a substantial proportion of emotion regulatory goals are derived from emotion norms. In contrast to universal emotion values and hedonic preferences, emotion norms are highly specific to social situations and institutional contexts. This specificity is determined by social cognitive processes of categorization and guided by framing rules. Second, I argue that the possibilities for antecedent-focused regulation, in particular situation selection and modification, are not arbitrarily available to individuals. Instead, they depend on economic, cultural, and social resources. I suggest that the systematic and unequal distribution of these resources in society leads to discernible patterns of emotion and emotion regulation across groups of individuals.

KEYWORDS:

deep acting; emotion norms; emotion regulation; emotion work; feeling rules

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Frontiers Media SA Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk