Subcapital fractures: a changing paradigm

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11 Suppl A):19-21. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30617.

Abstract

Options for the treatment of subcapital femoral neck fractures basically fall into two categories: internal fixation or arthroplasty (either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty). Historically, the treatment option has been driven by a diagnosis-related approach (non-displaced neck fractures versus displaced neck fractures). More recently, the traditional paradigm has changed. Instead of a diagnosis-related approach, it has become more of a patient-related approach. Treatment options take in to consideration the patient's age, functional demands, and individual risk profile. A simple algorithm can be helpful in terms of directing the treatment. Non-displaced fractures, regardless of age of the patient, should be treated with closed reduction and internal fixation. For displaced femoral neck fractures, the treatment differs depending on the age of the patient. The younger patient should be treated with urgent ORIF with the goal of an anatomic reduction. For displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly, cognitive function should be determined. For those who are cognitively functioning, total hip arthroplasty appears to be the best option. In the cognitively dysfunctional, a bipolar hemiarthroplasty or a total hip arthroplasty with use of larger heads (32 mm or 36 mm) and/or constrained sockets are a viable option.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Algorithms*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / diagnosis
  • Femoral Neck Fractures / surgery*
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods*
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Risk Assessment