Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Oct 30;5:601. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-601.

Jointly creating digital abstracts: dealing with synonymy and polysemy.

Author information

  • 1Systems Biology group, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 5, 7491 Trondheim, Norway. vercruys@nt.ntnu.no

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Ideally each Life Science article should get a 'structured digital abstract'. This is a structured summary of the paper's findings that is both human-verified and machine-readable. But articles can contain a large variety of information types and contextual details that all need to be reconciled with appropriate names, terms and identifiers, which poses a challenge to any curator. Current approaches mostly use tagging or limited entry-forms for semantic encoding.

FINDINGS:

We implemented a 'controlled language' as a more expressive representation method. We studied how usable this format was for wet-lab-biologists that volunteered as curators. We assessed some issues that arise with the usability of ontologies and other controlled vocabularies, for the encoding of structured information by 'untrained' curators. We take a user-oriented viewpoint, and make recommendations that may prove useful for creating a better curation environment: one that can engage a large community of volunteer curators.

CONCLUSIONS:

Entering information in a biocuration environment could improve in expressiveness and user-friendliness, if curators would be enabled to use synonymous and polysemous terms literally, whereby each term stays linked to an identifier.

PMID:
23110757
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3532140
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (3)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk