Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Oct;7(5):533-9.

Comparison of different trunk endurance testing methods in college-aged individuals.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Determine the reliability of two different modified (MOD1 and MOD2) testing methods compared to a standard method (ST) for testing trunk flexion and extension endurance.

PARTICIPANTS:

Twenty-eight healthy individuals (age 26.4 ± 3.2 years, height 1.75 ± m, weight 71.8 ± 10.3 kg, body mass index 23.6 ± 3.4 m/kg(2)).

METHOD:

Trunk endurance time was measured in seconds for flexion and extension under the three different stabilization conditions. The MOD1 testing procedure utilized a female clinician (70.3 kg) and MOD2 utilized a male clinician (90.7 kg) to provide stabilization as opposed to the ST method of belt stabilization.

RESULTS:

No significant differences occurred between flexion and extension times. Intraclass correlations (ICCs(3,1)) for the different testing conditions ranged from .79 to .95 (p <.000) and are found in Table 3. Concurrent validity using the ST flexion times as the gold standard coefficients were .95 for MOD1 and .90 for MOD2. For ST extension, coefficients were .91 and .80, for MOD1 and MOD2 respectively (p <.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

These methods proved to be a reliable substitute for previously accepted ST testing methods in normal college-aged individuals. These modified testing procedures can be implemented in athletic training rooms and weight rooms lacking appropriate tables for the ST testing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

3.

KEYWORDS:

Core; stabilization; trunk endurance

PMID:
23091786
[PubMed]
PMCID:
PMC3474305
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (3)Free text

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk