Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Feb;54(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00958.x. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

    Frequency of positive patch test reactions to preservatives: The Australian experience.

    Source

    Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia. dretchow@optusnet.com.au

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES:

    Preservatives are important causes of allergic contact dermatitis. The frequency of allergy to preservatives in Australia has been unknown to date. Our objectives are to report the frequency of positive preservative patch test reactions in Australia, comparing them to the published international data, as well as exploring the current regulations in place for preservative use in Australia.

    METHODS:

    This was the first retrospective study of patch testing results, aggregated from four patch test clinics in three centres in Melbourne and Sydney.

    RESULTS:

    In all, 6845 patients were patch-tested during 1993-2006 and in this period the five most frequent preservative allergens were formaldehyde (4.6%), Euxyl K400 (containing methyldibromo glutaronitrile and phenoxyethanol) (3.3%), quaternium-15 (2.9%), diazolidinyl urea (2.4%), and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (2.3%). These were followed by dimethylol dimethyl DMDM hydantoin (2.1%), chloroacetamide (2.1%) and imidazolidinyl urea (1.9%). The least frequent sensitisers were parabens (1.1%), 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1, 3-diol (0.9%) and benzyl alcohol (0.4%).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Formaldehyde was the most prevalent preservative allergen. Chloroacetamide allergy was more commonly seen in Australia. Parabens, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol and benzyl alcohol were the least frequent sensitisers. Household products in Australia are not required to list all ingredients preventing sensitised individuals from properly assessing their exposure.

    © 2012 The Authors Australasian Journal of Dermatology © 2012 The Australasian College of Dermatologists.

    PMID:
    23083503
    [PubMed - in process]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Blackwell Publishing

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk