Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Am Heart J. 2012 Oct;164(4):547-552.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.007.

Coronary angiographic scoring systems: an evaluation of their equivalence and validity.

Author information

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Multiple scoring systems have been devised to quantify angiographic coronary artery disease (CAD) burden, but it is unclear how these scores relate to each other and which scores are most accurate. The aim of this study was to compare coronary angiographic scoring systems (1) with each other and (2) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-derived plaque burden in a population undergoing angiographic evaluation for CAD.

METHODS:

Coronary angiographic data from 3600 patients were scored using 10 commonly used angiographic scoring systems and interscore correlations were calculated. In a subset of 50 patients, plaque burden and plaque area in the left anterior descending coronary artery were quantified using IVUS and correlated with angiographic scores.

RESULTS:

All angiographic scores correlated with each other (range for Spearman coefficient [ρ] 0.79-0.98, P < .0001); the 2 most widely used scores, Gensini and CASS-70, had a ρ = 0.90 (P < .0001). All scores correlated significantly with average plaque burden and plaque area by IVUS (range ρ 0.56-0.78, P < .0001 and 0.43-0.62, P < .01, respectively). The CASS-50 score had the strongest correlation (ρ 0.78 and 0.62, P < .0001) and the Duke Jeopardy score the weakest correlation (ρ 0.56 and 0.43, P < .01) with plaque burden and area, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Angiographic scoring systems are strongly correlated with each other and with atherosclerotic plaque burden. Scoring systems therefore appear to be a valid estimate of CAD plaque burden.

Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
23067913
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3913177
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk