Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Chemosphere. 2013 Feb;90(5):1631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.041. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

Sorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate to carbon nanotubes in aquatic sediments.

Author information

  • 1Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies, Wageningen UR, 1970 AB IJmuiden, The Netherlands.


To date, sorption of organic compounds to nanomaterials has mainly been studied for the nanomaterial in its pristine state. However, sorption may be different when nanomaterials are buried in sediments. Here, we studied sorption of Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) to sediment and to sediment with 4% multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), as a function of factors affecting PFOS sorption; aqueous concentration, pH and Ca(2+) concentration. Sorption to MWCNT in the sediment-MWCNT mixtures was assessed by subtracting the contribution of PFOS sorption to sediment-only from PFOS sorption to the total sediment-MWCNT mixture. PFOS Log K(D) values ranged 0.52-1.62 L kg(-1) for sediment and 1.91-2.90 L kg(-1) for MWCNT present in the sediment. The latter values are relatively low, which is attributed to fouling of MWCNT by sediment organic matter. PFOS sorption was near-linear for sediment (Freundlich exponent of 0.92 ± 0.063) but non-linear for MWCNT (Freundlich exponent of 0.66 ± 0.03). Consequently, the impact of MWCNT on sorption in the mixture was larger at low PFOS aqueous concentration. Effects of pH and Ca(2+) on PFOS sorption to MWCNT were statistically significant. We conclude that MWCNT fouling and PFOS concentration dependency are important factors affecting PFOS-MWCNT interactions in sediments.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk