Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212247109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

    Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

    Source

    Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

    Erratum in

    • Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 15;110(3):1137.

    Abstract

    A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.

    PMID:
    23027971
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC3479492
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (4)Free text

    Fig. 1.
    Fig. 2.
    Fig. 3.
    Fig. 4.

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk