Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):68-75. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02067.x. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

The humble Bayesian: model checking from a fully Bayesian perspective.

Author information

  • 1University of Groningen, The Netherlands. r.d.morey@rug.nl

Abstract

Gelman and Shalizi (2012) criticize what they call the 'usual story' in Bayesian statistics: that the distribution over hypotheses or models is the sole means of statistical inference, thus excluding model checking and revision, and that inference is inductivist rather than deductivist. They present an alternative hypothetico-deductive approach to remedy both shortcomings. We agree with Gelman and Shalizi's criticism of the usual story, but disagree on whether Bayesian confirmation theory should be abandoned. We advocate a humble Bayesian approach, in which Bayesian confirmation theory is the central inferential method. A humble Bayesian checks her models and critically assesses whether the Bayesian statistical inferences can reasonably be called upon to support real-world inferences.

© 2012 The British Psychological Society.

Comment in

Comment on

PMID:
23017054
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk