Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Stat Med. 2013 Jun 30;32(14):2467-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.5608. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

Correction of sampling bias in a cross-sectional study of post-surgical complications.

Author information

  • 1Department of Health Services Research, Ministry of Health, 29 Rivka Street, 91010 Jerusalem, Israel. rfluss@gmail.com

Abstract

Cross-sectional designs are often used to monitor the proportion of infections and other post-surgical complications acquired in hospitals. However, conventional methods for estimating incidence proportions when applied to cross-sectional data may provide estimators that are highly biased, as cross-sectional designs tend to include a high proportion of patients with prolonged hospitalization. One common solution is to use sampling weights in the analysis, which adjust for the sampling bias inherent in a cross-sectional design. The current paper describes in detail a method to build weights for a national survey of post-surgical complications conducted in Israel. We use the weights to estimate the probability of surgical site infections following colon resection, and validate the results of the weighted analysis by comparing them with those obtained from a parallel study with a historically prospective design.

Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PMID:
22949230
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk