Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):676-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2.

Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information.

Author information

  • 1Department of Upper GI Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK, CF14 4XW. dcsy23@gmail.com

Abstract

Internet-derived health care information is increasingly accessed by patients, yet its quality and accuracy is variable and unregulated. The aim of this study was to assess the information available regarding common gastrointestinal cancers via three internet search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The top 30 websites for each of the terms: oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon and rectal cancer were evaluated (University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Checklist) and scored [-80 (poor) to 90 (excellent)]. The median score was 53 (-7 to 81) and was significantly higher for oesophageal (61) and pancreatic (65) cancer websites, compared with gastric (49), colon (48) and rectal cancer (50) (pā€‰=ā€‰0.014). Median scores related to charitable organisations were significantly better than academic, commercial, news agency, care provider, layperson and medical information websites collectively (79 vs. 42, pā€‰<ā€‰0.0001). Overall quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information remains poor and patients and clinicians should be aware.

PMID:
22918796
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk