Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1009-15. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.28289.

The role of the design of tibial components and stems in knee replacement.

Author information

  • 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. chloe.scott@luht.nhs.scot.co.uk

Abstract

Stems improve the mechanical stability of tibial components in total knee replacement (TKR), but come at a cost of stress shielding along their length. Their advantages include resistance to shear, reduced tibial lift-off and increased stability by reducing micromotion. Longer stems may have disadvantages including stress shielding along the length of the stem with associated reduction in bone density and a theoretical risk of subsidence and loosening, peri-prosthetic fracture and end-of-stem pain. These features make long stems unattractive in the primary TKR setting, but often desirable in revision surgery with bone loss and instability. In the revision scenario, stems are beneficial in order to convey structural stability to the construct and protect the reconstruction of bony defects. Cemented and uncemented long stemmed implants have different roles depending on the nature of the bone loss involved. This review discusses the biomechanics of the design of tibial components and stems to inform the selection of the component and the technique of implantation.

PMID:
22844039
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk