Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Acad Med. 2012 Aug;87(8):1002-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31825d0b3a.

Commentary: grading: what is it good for?

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. steven.durning@usuhs.edu

Abstract

Grading students is a necessary but challenging activity. In this commentary, the authors respond to the compelling national data about clerkship grading in U.S. medical schools presented by Alexander and colleagues. They present perspectives and cautions for how the medical education community might perceive these findings and examine how the community can act to address them. The authors discuss several aspects of normative versus criterion-based grading, reliability, and educational theory to provide context for the results reported by Alexander and colleagues. To address variability among and within schools with regard to grading systems and terminology, the authors argue for more credible and transparent interpretation of what grades mean rather than inflexible regulation of grade distributions.

Comment in

Comment on

PMID:
22827984
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk