Background and objectives: Incomplete re-endothelialization of stents can be revealed as paradoxical vasoconstriction with endothelium-dependent vasodilators. As no consensus exists about the best method or agent, our objective is to analyze the response to different drugs in a coronary swine model.
Methods: Twenty-seven stents were implanted in 9 domestic swine. The vessel diameter of proximal and distal segments (≥5 mm) was assessed immediately post implantation. Different endothelium-dependent vasodilators were used: intracoronary (IC) acetylcholine, 20 μg (A2) and 40 μg (A4), IC serotonin (S), 100 μg, and isoproterenol (I), intravenous infusion. The results are presented as constriction (%) compared with maximal vasodilation with IC nitroglycerin (N, 200 μg).
Results: In 10 vessels (37%), A4 provoked an occlusive spasm. Acetylcholine induced a higher degree of vasoconstriction (A4, 42 ± 39%; A2, 16 ± 14%) than the rest of the agonists (S, 6 ± 12%; I, 6 ± 11%; P<.01). The constriction rate was not related to the induced hemodynamic changes.
Conclusions: After focal endothelial denudation in a coronary swine model, the constriction rate induced by different endothelium-dependent vasodilators is highly variable. The highest value is observed after IC acetylcholine bolus. The constriction rate does not correlate with the observed hemodynamic changes.