Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):667-81. doi: 10.1037/a0029223. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

Exaggerated, mispredicted, and misplaced: when "it's the thought that counts" in gift exchanges.

Author information

  • 1Business School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.


Gift-giving involves both the objective value of a gift and the symbolic meaning of the exchange. The objective value is sometimes considered of secondary importance as when people claim, "It's the thought that counts." We evaluated when and how mental state inferences count in gift exchanges. Because considering another's thoughts requires motivation and deliberation, we predicted gift givers' thoughts would increase receivers' appreciation only when triggered to consider a giver's thoughts, such as when a friend gives a bad gift. Because gift givers do not experience this trigger, we expected they would mispredict when their thoughts count and when they do not. Three experiments support these predictions. A final experiment demonstrated that thoughts "count" for givers by increasing social connection to the receiver. These results suggest that mental state inferences are not automatic in social interactions and that inferences about how much thoughts count are systematically miscalibrated.

(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk