Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Jul 30;209(1):212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering.

Author information

  • 1Neuroinformatics Doctoral Training Centre, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK. david.acunzo@ed.ac.uk

Erratum in

  • J Neurosci Methods. 2012 Nov 15;211(2):309.

Abstract

The event-related potential (ERP) and event-related field (ERF) techniques provide valuable insights into the time course of processes in the brain. Because neural signals are typically weak, researchers commonly filter the data to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. However, filtering may distort the data, leading to false results. Using our own EEG data, we show that acausal high-pass filtering can generate a systematic bias easily leading to misinterpretations of neural activity. In particular, we show that the early ERP component C1 is very sensitive to such effects. Moreover, we found that about half of the papers reporting modulations in the C1 range used a high-pass digital filter cut-off above the recommended maximum of 0.1 Hz. More generally, among 185 relevant ERP/ERF publications, 80 used cutoffs above 0.1 Hz. As a consequence, part of the ERP/ERF literature may need to be re-analyzed. We provide guidelines on how to minimize filtering artifacts.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PMID:
22743800
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk