Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):88-96. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110673.

Liver steatosis: concordance of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic data with histologic grade.

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Center for Molecular and Functional Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, Box 0946, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA. susan.noworolski@ucsf.edu

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To determine if the concordance of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR spectroscopic data with histologic measures of steatosis is affected by histologic magnification level, tissue heterogeneity, or assessment of tissue area versus that of hepatocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Written informed consent was obtained. In- and out-of-phase MR imaging and MR spectroscopic measures of steatosis were compared in 33 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and in 15 healthy volunteers. Concordance of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic data with histologic findings was assessed for (a) histologic examination at standard (×40 and ×100) versus high magnification (×200 and ×400), (b) heterogeneity and homogeneity of livers, and (c) percentage of tissue and hepatocytes that contained lipids. Evaluations included linear regression and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS:

In- and out-of-phase MR imaging and MR spectroscopic data were well correlated (R2=0.93) and generally concordant with histologic measures. Patients in whom MR fat fractions were higher than expected compared with steatosis grades at standard magnification histologic examination were upgraded significantly more often when high magnification was used than were the remaining patients (100% [10 of 10] vs 47% [7 of 15], P<.01). MR imaging and MR spectroscopic data of homogeneous livers were significantly more likely than those of heterogeneous livers to be concordant with steatosis grades when high magnification was used (81% [13 of 16] vs 47% [8 of 17], P<.05). For all patients, percentage of fat in tissue was lower than that in hepatocytes, which affected individual patients, but not the overall correlation.

CONCLUSION:

MR imaging and MR spectroscopic data were generally concordant with histologic measures of steatosis. Discordance between them may reflect differences in magnification at histologic examination and in liver heterogeneity.

© RSNA, 2012.

PMID:
22723561
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3380413
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (10)Free text

Figure 1:
Figure 2a:
Figure 2b:
Figure 3:
Figure 4a:
Figure 4b:
Figure 4c:
Figure 4d:
Figure 5a:
Figure 5b:
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk