Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Results: 20

1.

Fat tissue measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of 3 different fan-beam instruments.

Malouf J, DiGregorio S, Del Rio L, Torres F, Marin AM, Farrerons J, Herrera S, Domingo P.

J Clin Densitom. 2013 Apr-Jun;16(2):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

PMID:
22698632
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
2.

Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: body composition and bone mineral.

Soriano JM, Ioannidou E, Wang J, Thornton JC, Horlick MN, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, Pierson RN.

J Clin Densitom. 2004 Fall;7(3):281-9.

PMID:
15319498
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
3.
4.

Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.

Aasen G, Fagertun H, Halse J.

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66(8):659-66.

PMID:
17101558
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
5.

X-ray diffraction imaging with the Multiple Inverse Fan Beam topology: principles, performance and potential for security screening.

Harding G, Fleckenstein H, Kosciesza D, Olesinski S, Strecker H, Theedt T, Zienert G.

Appl Radiat Isot. 2012 Jul;70(7):1228-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.12.015. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22245364
[PubMed]
6.

Pencil-beam versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: appendicular lean soft tissue.

Ioannidou E, Padilla J, Wang J, Heymsfield SB, Thornton JC, Horlick M, Gallagher D, Pierson RN Jr.

Acta Diabetol. 2003 Oct;40 Suppl 1:S83-5.

PMID:
14618441
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
7.

Retraction: Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp-derived stem cells. X Yang, S Zhang, X Pang, and M Fan.

[No authors listed]

J Cell Biochem. 2012 Aug;113(8):2796. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24283. No abstract available.

PMID:
22711476
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
8.

Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems.

Patel R, Blake GM, Batchelor S, Fogelman I.

Br J Radiol. 1996 Jun;69(822):539-43.

PMID:
8757656
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
9.

Comparison of pencil-, fan-, and cone-beam dual X-ray absorptiometers for evaluation of bone mineral content in excised rat bone.

Libouban H, Simon Y, Silve C, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Audran M, Chappard D.

J Clin Densitom. 2002 Winter;5(4):355-61.

PMID:
12665635
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
10.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.

Blake GM, Parker JC, Buxton FM, Fogelman I.

Br J Radiol. 1993 Oct;66(790):902-6.

PMID:
8220974
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
11.

Accuracy and precision of bone mineral density and bone mineral content in excised rat humeri using fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Kastl S, Sommer T, Klein P, Hohenberger W, Engelke K.

Bone. 2002 Jan;30(1):243-6.

PMID:
11792592
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
12.

Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.

Ellis KJ, Shypailo RJ.

J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Oct;13(10):1613-8.

PMID:
9783550
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
13.

Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.

Blake GM, Harrison EJ, Adams JE.

Calcif Tissue Int. 2004 Jul;75(1):7-14.

PMID:
15037973
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
14.

Bone and body composition measurements of small subjects: discrepancies from software for fan-beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Koo WW, Hammami M, Shypailo RJ, Ellis KJ.

J Am Coll Nutr. 2004 Dec;23(6):647-50.

PMID:
15637212
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
15.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of inferior calcaneal enthesophytosis: outcome by fan-beam dual x ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Cosentino R, Frediani B, De Stefano R, Acciai C, Manca S, Selvi E, Frati E, Marcolongo R.

Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Dec;63(12):1704-5. No abstract available.

PMID:
15547104
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
16.

Body composition of neonates from fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement.

Hammami M, Koo WW, Hockman EM.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003 Nov-Dec;27(6):423-6.

PMID:
14621124
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
17.

Differences between dual X-ray absorptiometry using pencil beam and fan beam modes and their determinants in vivo and in vitro.

Ruetsche AG, Lippuner K, Jaeger P, Casez JP.

J Clin Densitom. 2000 Summer;3(2):157-66.

PMID:
10871910
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
18.

Technical considerations for fan-beam dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements in pediatric studies.

Hammami M, Koo WW, Hockman EM.

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):328-33.

PMID:
15449572
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
19.

Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.

Norcross J, Van Loan MD.

Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):472-6.

PMID:
15273189
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
20.

Use of fan beam dual energy x-ray absorptiometry to measure body composition of piglets.

Koo WW, Hammami M, Hockman EM.

J Nutr. 2002 Jun;132(6):1380-3.

PMID:
12042462
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free Article

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Write to the Help Desk