Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Biomol NMR. 2012 May;53(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s10858-012-9621-x. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

Quantitative comparison of errors in 15N transverse relaxation rates measured using various CPMG phasing schemes.

Author information

  • 1Department of Structural Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Rm 1037, Biomedical Science Tower 3, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.

Abstract

Nitrogen-15 Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) transverse relaxation experiment are widely used to characterize protein backbone dynamics and chemical exchange parameters. Although an accurate value of the transverse relaxation rate, R(2), is needed for accurate characterization of dynamics, the uncertainty in the R(2) value depends on the experimental settings and the details of the data analysis itself. Here, we present an analysis of the impact of CPMG pulse phase alternation on the accuracy of the (15)N CPMG R(2). Our simulations show that R(2) can be obtained accurately for a relatively wide spectral width, either using the conventional phase cycle or using phase alternation when the r.f. pulse power is accurately calibrated. However, when the r.f. pulse is miscalibrated, the conventional CPMG experiment exhibits more significant uncertainties in R(2) caused by the off-resonance effect than does the phase alternation experiment. Our experiments show that this effect becomes manifest under the circumstance that the systematic error exceeds that arising from experimental noise. Furthermore, our results provide the means to estimate practical parameter settings that yield accurate values of (15)N transverse relaxation rates in the both CPMG experiments.

PMID:
22466935
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk