Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):191-199A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.091876. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

External quality assessment of national public health laboratories in Africa, 2002-2009.

Author information

  • 1National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. johnf@nicd.ac.za

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To describe findings from an external quality assessment programme involving laboratories in Africa that routinely investigate epidemic-prone diseases.

METHODS:

Beginning in 2002, the Regional Office for Africa of the World Health Organization (WHO) invited national public health laboratories and related facilities in Africa to participate in the programme. Three surveys comprising specimens and questionnaires associated with bacterial enteric diseases, bacterial meningitis, plague, tuberculosis and malaria were sent annually to test participants' diagnostic proficiency. Identical surveys were sent to referee laboratories for quality control. Materials were prepared, packaged and shipped in accordance with standard protocols. Findings and reports were due within 30 days. Key methodological decisions and test results were categorized as acceptable or unacceptable on the basis of consensus feedback from referees, using established grading schemes.

FINDINGS:

Between 2002 and 2009, participation increased from 30 to 48 Member States of the WHO and from 39 to 78 laboratories. Each survey was returned by 64-93% of participants. Mean turnaround time was 25.9 days. For bacterial enteric diseases and meningitis components, bacterial identification was acceptable in 65% and 69% of challenges, respectively, but serotyping and antibiotic susceptibility testing and reporting were frequently unacceptable. Microscopy was acceptable for 73% of plague challenges. Tuberculosis microscopy was satisfactorily performed, with 87% of responses receiving acceptable scores. In the malaria component, 82% of responses received acceptable scores for species identification but only 51% of parasite quantitation scores were acceptable.

CONCLUSION:

The external quality assessment programme consistently identified certain functional deficiencies requiring strengthening that were present in African public health microbiology laboratories.

PMID:
22461714
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3314205
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Scientific Electronic Library Online Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk