Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jun;32(4):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 12.

A review of the definitions of outcome used in the treatment of bulimia nervosa.

Author information

  • 1School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Abstract

There are many terms used to describe treatment outcome for bulimia nervosa. However, the way such terms are conceptualised across various studies differs dramatically, making comparison of outcomes difficult. A consensus working definition of pivotal terms such as remission and recovery is important if treatments are to be adequately evaluated and clinical meaning derived for individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN). The central aim of the current review was to identify different definitions of remission and recovery and their utility in terms of client outcome after treatment for BN. Seventy one unique published treatment studies were identified that used 82 different outcome measures, of which 63 (77%) used behavioural outcomes only, with the most commonly used outcome (n=7 studies) being an abstinence of bingeing and vomiting for a 4 week period. The problems with the definitions of outcomes used to date are explored, and the implications of research in anorexia nervosa for forming consensus definitions of remission and recovery for BN will be examined. In addition, the review highlights the importance of considering the relationship between quality of life and outcome in assessing the "goodness of fit" of a definition of outcome.

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PMID:
22459790
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk