Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Child Dev. 2012 May-Jun;83(3):779-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. legare@psy.utexas.edu

Abstract

Although often conceptualized in contradictory terms, the common assumption that natural and supernatural explanations are incompatible is psychologically inaccurate. Instead, there is considerable evidence that the same individuals use both natural and supernatural explanations to interpret the very same events and that there are multiple ways in which both kinds of explanations coexist in individual minds. Converging developmental research from diverse cultural contexts in 3 areas of biological thought (i.e., the origin of species, illness, and death) is reviewed to support this claim. Contrary to traditional accounts of cognitive development, new evidence indicates that supernatural explanations often increase rather than decrease with age and supports the proposal that reasoning about supernatural phenomena is an integral and enduring aspect of human cognition.

© 2012 The Authors. Child Development © 2012 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.

PMID:
22417318
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk